Modern churches produce weak men. This isn’t accidental - it’s the inevitable result of fundamentally misunderstanding the most important concept in the Bible. The “Muscular Christianity” movement of the 1800s figured this out, but we forgot their lessons and now wonder why churches are filled with soft, broken men who can’t lead families or defend territory.
The Sacrifices of God
God has a unique interest in humility. This is poorly understood in Christian circles. Prior to Jesus eliminating the second temple system and it’s elaborate methods of sacrifices to God to cleanse sins, the Old Testament actually laid out spiritual methods to cleanse sins.
These spiritual methods are called “The Sacrifices of God.”
Psalm 51:17 reveals the core truth: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.” This passage shows God values internal brokenness over external religious performance. David wrote this after his massive failure with Bathsheba, completely humbled before God. The Hebrew word for “broken” here means shattered beyond repair - not just damaged but utterly destroyed. Isaiah 57:15 reinforces this pattern: “For this is what the high and exalted One says - he who lives forever, whose name is holy: I live in a high and holy place, but also with the one who is contrite and lowly in spirit.” God literally chooses to dwell with the crushed rather than the proud. This is the spiritual sacrifice system that bypasses temples and priests entirely.
The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.
Descent for the Sake of Ascent
The rabbis understood this pattern as “descent for the sake of ascent.” Man naturally starts from a position of self-exaltation: we’re born believing we’re the center of the universe. This is the default human frame. But God’s view of righteousness (dikaiosune) requires a complete reversal of this starting position.
Scripture reveals this “descent-ascent” pattern repeatedly. Jacob wrestled with God all night until his hip was dislocated - completely broken physically before receiving his blessing and new name Israel. Moses spent forty years as a shepherd in the wilderness, stripped of his Egyptian prince identity, before God called him to lead Israel. Joseph endured slavery and false imprisonment, losing everything, before becoming second in command of Egypt. David fled caves as a fugitive, hunted by Saul, experiencing total powerlessness before ascending to the throne. Paul was struck blind on the Damascus road, his religious pride shattered, before becoming the greatest apostle.
Each man had to be completely broken in their area of greatest strength - Jacob’s physical power, Moses’ political position, Joseph’s favored status, David’s military prowess, Paul’s religious credentials - before God could use them. The pattern is unmistakable: God breaks what we’re most proud of to create the contrite heart.
The descent isn’t optional or partial. It’s a total dismantling of the self-exalted position that every human occupies by default. Only through this humbling process - this complete descent from our natural pride - can we gain the contrite heart that God actually desires. The rabbis figured out that you can’t ascend to God from a position of strength. You have to descend first. This descent breaks the pride that blocks genuine relationship with God, creating the internal brokenness that Psalm 51 describes as the only sacrifice God won’t reject.
The Hebrew terms capture this pattern precisely. “Yeridah” means descent or going down - the necessary humbling that breaks human pride. “Aliyah” means ascent or going up - the spiritual elevation that follows genuine brokenness. These weren’t abstract concepts but practical spiritual technology. The rabbis understood that yeridah l’tzorech aliyah - “descent for the sake of ascent” - was God’s consistent method throughout Scripture. You can’t skip the yeridah and expect the aliyah. The descent creates the contrite heart that makes ascent possible.
This descent-ascent pattern is the fundamental nature of humility.
You can’t ascend to God from a position of strength. You have to descend first.
Why Jesus Chose Fishermen
Jesus chose fishermen because their profession demanded complete humility. First-century fishing on the Sea of Galilee meant facing uncontrollable circumstances - violent weather destroying nets, unpredictable fish populations, brutal economic reality with no guaranteed income. They also had to avoid authorities on sabbath, as well as patrolling roman authorities. They worked in teams, requiring absolute cooperation for survival. No lonewolves.
The physical demands were relentless - hauling nets, rowing against storms, working dangerous nights. Most importantly, fishing taught men they controlled nothing. You could master every technique and still return empty-handed. This profession created the broken, contrite heart God requires - men who understood complete dependence and had their pride systematically stripped away by circumstances beyond their control.
The fishing cooperatives of first-century Galilee operated as tight communal structures that likely inspired the early church design. These cooperatives weren’t just business partnerships but survival networks where fishermen pooled resources, shared boats and nets, and divided catches according to established protocols. Each cooperative had recognized leaders who made decisions about fishing locations, weather conditions, and resource allocation. Members submitted to this collective authority because individual survival depended on group success.
The cooperative structure created natural accountability - lazy or selfish members threatened everyone’s livelihood. This system produced men accustomed to collective decision-making, shared responsibility, and submission to group leadership for the common good. When Jesus called these fishermen, he found men already trained in the communal dynamics that would define the early church: shared resources, collective leadership, mutual accountability, and the understanding that individual success meant nothing without group survival.
Muscular Christianity: Rise and Lessons
This brings us back to Muscular Christianity. Muscular Christianity emerged in the mid-1800s as a movement that rejected the feminized, passive Christianity dominating Victorian churches. Leaders like Charles Kingsley and Thomas Hughes promoted physical strength, athletic competition, and masculine virtue as essential Christian qualities. They believed true Christian men should be warriors, not weaklings - combining spiritual devotion with physical prowess. The movement spawned organizations like the YMCA and influenced entire generations of Christian men to embrace fitness, sports, and aggressive evangelism. But the movement died out by the early 1900s.
Two world wars completely shattered its optimistic view that physical strength and Christian virtue naturally aligned. The brutal reality of mechanized warfare revealed that muscles meant nothing against machine guns and poison gas. The movement’s leaders had promoted war as character-building, but the massive casualties and psychological trauma of modern combat destroyed this romantic notion. Churches shifted toward pacifism and comfort rather than physical confrontation. The rise of professional sports also redirected masculine energy away from Christian contexts into secular entertainment. By the 1920s, the institutional structures remained but the spiritual fire had burned out completely.
But I think there is much to learn from this short lived impulse in Christianity. The movement correctly identified a massive problem - the feminization and passivity that had infected church culture. These men figured out that Christianity without physical challenges leads to bad theology disconnected from the humbling nature of reality. They figured out that genuine faith demands being broken by reality in a significant way in your life, not comfortable religious performance. It is no surprise that Muscular Christianity arose during the industrial revolution, which was the beginning of a new era of abundance - and therefore a changed, softer reality that disconnected men from the natural humbling realities of life.
Abundance and Leadership
Fast forward deep into the abundance paradigm and you’ll see there’s something very wrong in the modern church. Modern church leaders exist in a completely different physical and economic reality than biblical figures who experienced genuine descent. Most pastors own appreciating homes, drive reliable cars, live in safe neighborhoods, and operate within institutional structures that shield them from harsh realities. Their salaries provide consistent comfort, their social status protects them from humbling experiences.
Many have never faced financial ruin, physical danger, or social exile - the experiences Scripture shows as necessary for spiritual formation. Western abundance combined with professional ministry creates an environment where church leadership can maintain their self-exalted position indefinitely. These leaders drift from one defended space to the next. Comfortable childhood homes lead to safe teenage environments. Seminary campuses provide insulated academic territory. Professional ministry positions offer institutional protection. Each transition happens within carefully managed Christian territories that operate inside abundance capitalism’s protective bubble. They preach brokenness from a life of comfort, teach surrender while holding security others couldn’t dream of, and call others to humility while insulated from evey type of circumstance that could humble them.
Some pastors do reach leadership through genuine trial, following the biblical pattern of descent before ascent. Most don’t. Scripture makes God’s preference clear - he values humble leaders above all others, declaring Moses the greatest leader precisely because he was the most humble man alive after his brutal forty-year wilderness descent.
Physical Standards as Spiritual Formation
The iron doesn’t lie and your body composition reveals the truth about your discipline regardless of what words you speak.
This is why the Muscular Christianity movement figured out something we forgot. The modern church needs structural change to institutionalize humility. Biology offers one clear metric - physical fitness. Physical standards would create a council that naturally filters for men who’ve experienced the humbling descent that produces genuine spiritual authority. Getting fit is a very humbling and follows the same descent-ascent pattern God uses throughout Scripture.
Transforming your body demands complete surrender of pride. You have to admit you have a problem instead of living in comfortable delusion. You must listen to others who know more than you. You must submit to your body’s design rather than your own understanding. The gym becomes a place of weekly failure where your weakness gets exposed and your excuses get stripped away. It’s literally called “going to failure” as a measure of achievement. This creates the same broken frame those Galilean fishermen carried - men who understood they controlled nothing.
Facing biological reality forces the type of humility that modern physical and economic comfort prevents.
Imagine a church where elders must deadlift 1.5x their bodyweight and have less than 18% bodyfat to hold office. The congregation would gain leaders who understand struggle intimately - men who’ve been humbled weekly by biological reality and can therefore extend genuine compassion to others facing their own battles, whether spiritual, physical, or emotional, because they know what it means to fail repeatedly and keep pushing forward. These leaders would offer the kind of compassionate spiritual authority that naturally draws people in - men who speak from their own scars and struggles, who remember exactly what it feels like to sruggle and can therefore meet people with genuine understanding wherever they find themselves. This would instantly separate the comfortable religious performers from men who’ve actually been humbled by reality. No more hiding behind theological degrees while avoiding the descent that creates genuine spiritual authority.
Physical fitness isn’t the only path to humility, but it creates a measurable standard that reveals character. Modern churches operate with zero requirements. Soft boomers who built wealth through house appreciation and monetary schemes lack the broken frame needed for genuine spiritual insight. They mirror the scribes and pharisees who taught from comfort while missing God’s heart completely.
The elder or pastor who’s fit and self-controlled has submitted to biological reality in a way that gets closer to the contrite heart Scripture demands. He’s experienced weekly failure, pushed through pain, and learned complete dependence on principles beyond his control. This man preaches numility because he lived it and ascended through it. He teaches surrender because the gym has stripped away his pride systematically. The physical standard becomes a spiritual filter - only men who’ve descended through the humbling process of physical transformation can ascend to leadership. This eliminates the comfortable religious performance that dominates modern churches. The iron doesn’t lie and your body composition reveals the truth about your discipline regardless of what words you speak.
We can’t pick fishermen to lead communities like Jesus did, but we can easily pick those with physical standards. The Muscular Christianity movement figured this out over a century ago - they saw the age of soft men destroying the church and fought back with physical standards. We need to look back to their model and rekindle it for our era. They understood something we’ve forgotten: genuine spiritual authority requires descent through physical reality, not the performative humility that modern Christianity has perfected.
This is the core conviction behind Tournament Male — that men need physical standards, brotherhood, and shared accountability to become who they were designed to be. The Bible says iron sharpens iron, and we take that literally. If this resonates, take our quiz to see where you stand, or read more about the evolutionary science behind tournament species and why understanding your biology is the first step toward genuine masculine development.
Related reading: What is the Tournament Male? · Tournament vs Pairbonding Males · C12 Group, a Christian CEO peer group, compared